All posts by admin

Bernie Madoff : Scamming of America – The $50 Billion Ponzi Scheme

———-

Forbes:”If indeed, $50 billion was lost, as apparently Madoff claims, it is the largest such fraud in history, and one that might even shame the conman whose name is attached to this brand of deception. In 1920, Charles Ponzi, an Italian immigrant, began advertising that he could make a 50% return for investors in only 45 days. Incredibly, Ponzi began taking in money from all over New England and New Jersey. By July of 1920, he was making millions as people mortgaged their homes and invested their life savings. As with all frauds, he was discovered to have a jail record and was indicted on 86 counts of fraud. Some tens of millions of dollars were invested with him.”

In the streamlined (if somewhat simplified) opening of Ripped Off: Madoff and the Scamming of America, it is noted that “he puts a face on what we’ve all been feeling.” It’s a succinct and accurate characterization of the man who ran an elaborate, decades-long Ponzi scheme, bilking countless private investors and charities out of an estimated $65 billion dollars. The disclosure of his fraud, in the midst of the worst economic landscape since the Great Depression, grafted the face of a real-life villain onto the greed and excess of the Bush years–it’s hard to personify (or even understand) a credit default swap or a NINA loan, but this was a guy that we could point at and say, “Him! Get him!”

The History Channel’s short documentary examination of the Madoff scandal utilizes interviews with journalists, historians, and victims, in addition to some excellent archival footage (particularly those chilling tapes of Madoff holding court in the late 1990s as a wise elder statesman of the financial world). The special contains some valuable biographical information, not only of Madoff’s humble beginnings as a Queens-born stock broker, but of Carlo Ponzi (the namesake of the Ponzi scheme) and other con artists who operated in Madoff’s style, though perhaps not to his excess.

There’s plenty of solid information to be found here–how the lure of the Madoff investment was its exclusivity (he didn’t let just anyone throw away their money with him) and it’s slow steady performance (one victim notes, quite convincingly, “this was not a get-rich-quick scheme”); the tale of Harry Markopolis, the financial analyst who attempted, for the better part of a decade, to alert the SEC that Madoff was a crook; and the tragic story of Rene-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet, the hedge fund operator who responded to the news that his fund’s $1.4 billion investment with Madoff wasn’t worth the paper it was printed on by slashing his wrists in his Manhattan office.

The documentary moves a breakneck pace, a flurry of images and definitions and images and soundbites, though for all of the information it contains, it occasionally sacrifices nuance for the sake of a quick pulse. The misfortune of Ripped Off is that it follows Frontline’s superior examination of the scandal, The Madoff Affair, into the marketplace; that program was simply stronger, with better access to more people on the inside and a more in-depth analysis of the Madoff story. Taken on its own terms, however, Ripped Off is a solid, if less than spectacular, television documentary program.

Intellectual property law and examples

Best Intellectual Property Lawyers

Call Us 24 Hours A Day 800-270-8184 or Emergency Cell 818-355-4076

Hire Intellectual Property Lawyers

Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Lawyer

Our intellectual property lawyers help shield, protect, and keep you safeguarded under the law. We keep our prices and costs low because we know that many other intellectual property lawyers tend to inflate their fees as IP lawyers.

 

Wise Laws best intellectual property lawyers can help you guard, license, and enforce your intellectual property rights. We handle a high capacity of trademark and copyright registrations as well as bring and protect intellectual property lawsuits. We also protect individuals threatened with copyright infringement lawsuits dealing with peer to peer networks and the bit torrent sites.

 

Tallahassee Intellectual Property LawyersOrlando Intellectual Property LawyersDallas Intellectual Property LawyersFort Worth Intellectual Property LawyersHonolulu Intellectual Property LawyersBoise Intellectual Property LawyersBismarck Intellectual Property LawyersGrafton Intellectual Property LawyersRaleigh Intellectual Property LawyersDurham Intellectual Property LawyersSanta Fe Intellectual Property LawyersAlbuquerque Intellectual Property LawyersAlbany Intellectual Property LawyersPhoenix Intellectual Property LawyersPeoria Intellectual Property LawyersLas Vegas Intellectual Property LawyersLouisville Intellectual Property LawyersLittle Rock Intellectual Property LawyersLos Angeles Intellectual Property LawyersMiami Intellectual Property LawyersDes Moines Intellectual Property LawyersNew Haven Intellectual Property LawyersIndianapolis Intellectual Property LawyersDetroit Intellectual Property LawyersJoplin Intellectual Property LawyersBiloxi Intellectual Property LawyersOklahoma City Intellectual Property LawyersPortland Intellectual Property LawyersSioux Falls Intellectual Property LawyersNashville Intellectual Property LawyersMemphis Intellectual Property LawyersHouston Intellectual Property LawyersTacoma Intellectual Property LawyersMinneapolis Intellectual Property LawyersProvo Intellectual Property LawyersTulsa Intellectual Property LawyersAnnapolis Intellectual Property LawyersSacramento Intellectual Property LawyersDenver Intellectual Property LawyersCharlotte Intellectual Property LawyersBoston Intellectual Property LawyersOlympia Intellectual Property LawyersAtlanta Intellectual Property LawyersSanta Monica Intellectual Property LawyersMalibu Intellectual Property LawyersTucson Intellectual Property LawyersScottsdale Intellectual Property LawyersBeverly Hills Intellectual Property LawyersBoca Raton Intellectual Property Lawyers

 

Intellectual property has encouraged business development while concurrently creating a possible minefield of legal battles and predicaments. The multilayered process of identifying, protecting, defending, maximizing and enforcing intellectual property rights requires a multidisciplinary method, and our intellectual property lawyers have the knowledge needed to supply results.

 

Some Topics Our American Intellectual Property Lawyers Can Handle:

 

  • American Copyrights registration, licensing & protection
  • American Copyright Applications
  • American Trademarks registration, licensing & protection
  • American Trademark Applications
  • American Trade Secret protection
  • Freedom to Operate Analyses
  • Infringement or Non Infringement Opinions
  • American Patent Applications
  • American International IP Law

 

A patent application has often been noted by lawyers as the most complex and layered legal document to prepare and put together because it must conform to strict legal guidelines and regulations, so as to result a patent in America and beyond is valid and enforceable.

 

American Copyright Law

We have dealt with wide range of Angie copyright issues concerning software, digital music, publishing, kid books, graphic design, and more. Copyright law awards a copyright owner a set of exclusive rights to his or her appearance of an idea or information. American copyright may survive in a wide range of creative, intellectual, or artistic forms, comprising poems, plays, novels, movies, musical compositions and recordings, paintings, drawings, sculptures, photographs, and software.

 

American Copyright Law Issues

 

  • American Copyright registration, licensing and protection
  • American Copyright litigation
  • American Drafting work-made-for-hire agreements
  • American Licensing agreements
  • American Publishing contracts
  • American Distribution agreements
  • American Digital Millennium Copyright Act Lawyers
  • American Music clearance Lawyers

 

American Copyright Infringement

American copyright infringement occurs when the unlawful use of the protected work violates the rights of the owner. American copyright infringement has come to be very problem oriented with the introduction of the Internet. Before the web American copyright infringement was much easier to catch.

 

American Trademarking Lawyers

We have knowledge dealing with all stages of American trademark selection, protection, and enforcement and we have operated on American trademark issues in a wide range of businesses including software companies, web businesses, pharmaceutical companies, and restaurants. Whether you are getting ready to a launch a business in America or a product or you have been operating for years, American trademark protection of your company, product name, design, color, slogans or packaging is crucial.

 

For more specific about trademarks please contact our American Trademark Lawyers

American Patent Lawyer Process

If you have established an invention and seek to protect and guard it, you need an knowledgeable American patent lawyer licensed with the state and shown with the United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO who can escort you through the patenting procedure. Your American patent application will either be a Utility, Design, Plant, or Provisional Application. During our Angie patent law session, we will inform you as to which type of application is correct for your invention.

Largest lawsuit against an auditor goes to court for $5.5 billion

Colonial Bank in Miami Beach, on August 17, 2009, days after it failed. The bank’s fraud with Taylor, Bean & Whitaker is the subject of a lawsuit against its auditor, PricewaterhouseCooper, which failed to catch the fraud for seven years. John VanBeekum Miami Herald

The largest-ever lawsuit against an auditing firm is set to open Monday in a Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, pitting Big Four firm PwC against a trustee of the defunct Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corporation.

At stake: $5.5 billion.

The lawsuit was filed in 2013 by a trust formed following the bankruptcy of Ocala-based Taylor, Bean & Whitaker, which in the early 2000s was one of the nation’s largest mortgage companies. The firm was raided by federal agents in 2009 for its part in a seven-year, multibillion-dollar fraud scheme with Colonial BancGroup.

According to the lawsuit, the fraud went undetected by PwC, the independent public auditor in charge of auditing Colonial, as a result of “gross negligence.”

The $5.5 billion action is one of a wave of suits against major auditing firms, including PwC, in the aftermath of the 2009 banking crisis. Most have alleged faulty work, said Jonathan Perlman, equity partner at Miami-based firm Genovese Joblove & Battista, who has prosecuted several cases against auditing firms. A majority of the cases have settled, including a suit brought against PwC for the alleged negligent auditing of failed brokerage MF Global Holdings Ltd. PwC paid $65 million in a settlement.

Few of the suits have gone to trial, Perlman said.

Still, Steven Thomas, lead trial lawyer for the trust, said he is confident this suit will succeed.

Thomas, who has has obtained several multimillion-dollar settlements and verdicts in cases involving negligent audits, said PwC’s alleged negligence is the “worst” of any case he’s had.

As early as 2002, six top executives at Taylor, Bean & Whitaker, including chairman Lee Farkas, colluded with two executives at Colonial to sign off on mortgage sales that didn’t exist. Colonial financed Taylor, Bean & Whitaker’s mortgages, but in order to bypass the federal lending limit, Colonial started registering loans from the mortgage company as sales instead.

Circumventing the lending limits allowed the fraud to grow exponentially as executives at each company worked to falsify documents and computer entries and shift money between Colonial bank accounts. Both Colonial and Taylor, Bean & Whitaker were raided on Aug. 3, 2009, and later filed for bankruptcy, leading to the sixth-largest banking failure in U.S. history.

Farkas was sentenced to 30 years in federal prison. Catherine Kissick at Colonial, who worked most closely with Farkas, received eight years in prison as part of a plea deal.

 

Feds: Ex-mob boss Salemme, nabbed for murder, was on the run

This is a photo released by the FBI showing reputed New England Mafia leader Francis P. “Cadillac Frank” Salemme, after his arrest Aug. 11, 1995, in West Palm Beach, Fla. Salemme has been charged with lying to investigators about his role in the 1993 killing of a nightclub owner in order to get a shorter sentence for his racketeering conviction. Salemme, 71, was charged in 1995 with participating in eight murders. He pleaded guilty and agreed to cooperate with federal investigators. He was astar witness for the government in the trial of corrupt FBI agent John Connolly Jr. (AP Photo/FBI)

By MATT STOUT

Former New England mafia godfather Frank “Cadillac” Salemme was ordered held without bail today on charges he murdered a federal witness after prosecutors say he went on the run from a witness protection program.

Salemme, appearing in federal court today wearing baggy brown pants, sneakers and a blue t-shirt, did not challenge a detention order and waived his right to a probable cause hearing before being led away in handcuffs.

The 82-year-old mobster was smiling at times and even joking during his brief court appearance: As he was led into the courtroom, he quipped to long-time federal prosecutor Fred Wyshak, “Fancy seeing you here.”

Salemme is charged with the murder of a witness on May 10, 1993, according to a criminal complaint. Wyshak confirmed outside the courtroom that the murdered witness, who was not named in court, was nightclub owner Stephen DiSarro.

According to an indictment of another aging former mobster made public earlier this summer, Salemme and his son, Frank Salemme Jr., murdered  DiSarro on that date. DiSarro’s remains were found behind a mill in Providence in late March.

The initial Salemme revelation came in the indictment in June of ex-La Costa Nostra gang member Robert P. DeLuca, 70, on charges of lying to federal investigators about DiSarro’s disappearance and murder.

The Salemmes had a “hidden interest” in DiSarro’s Channel club, and that relationship came up during criminal investigations in the early 1990s, according to the DeLuca indictment.

The indictment on the murder charges against Salemme has been sealed from the public.

Salemme, who was the boss of the New England La Cosa Nostra in the 1990s until he was indicted on racketeering charges in 1995 and convicted in 1999, was arrested this morning in Connecticut.

Salemme was “fleeing from potential prosecution” and had left his home in Atlanta, Ga., Wyshak said.

Salemme’s lawyer, Steven Boozang, denied that his client was on the run.

“He was on his way back to answer any charges,” Boozang told reporters after the hearing. He said Salemme denies the charges and is determined to bring the case to trial.

Sourced From – http://www.bostonherald.com/news/local_coverage/2016/08/feds_ex_mob_boss_salemme_nabbed_for_murder_was_on_the_run

Why Ed Sheeran should be worried about allegedly copying a Marvin Gaye song

Remember the “Blurred Lines” lawsuit? Well, it set a precedent.

By Danielle Cheesman

To all the brides and grooms who chose Ed Sheeran‘s 2014 hit “Thinking Out Loud” to serve as the soundtrack to their first dance, your marriage is doomed.

Just kidding.

But the track’s legacy is at risk of being tarnished. The song—which was the first to ever to hit 500 million streams on Spotify and won Song of the Year at this year’s Grammy Awards—is being sued by the family of Ed Townsend, who co-wrote and created the musical composition of Marvin Gaye‘s “Let’s Get It On,” for copyright infringement of the 1973 classic.

How so, you might ask, since it samples no beat and borrows no lyrics?

Because of its “heart.” No, really.

Hip-Hop celebrates the life of Marvin Gaye with samples

According to Reuters, the lawsuit, filed in federal court in the Southern District of New York, claims that “the Defendants copied the ‘heart’ of ‘Let’s’ and repeated it continuously throughout ‘Thinking.’ The melodic, harmonic, and rhythmic compositions of ‘Thinking’ are substantially and/or strikingly similar to the drum composition of ‘Let’s.'”

While this may sound like a reach, what Sheeran has working against him is that Gaye grip. The force they flex.

While the Gaye family is not technically involved in Townsend’s suit against Sheeran, let’s not forget that their estate won $7.3 million last year in their lawsuit filed against Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke over the duo’s “Blurred Lines” smash, a song they alleged soundedtoo similar to Gaye’s “Got To Give It Up.”

In that case, Williams and Thicke dismissed the family’s argument,writing that “the basis of the Gaye defendants’ claims is that ‘Blurred Lines’ and ‘Got To Give It Up’ ‘feel’ or ‘sound’ the same. Being reminiscent of a ‘sound’ is not copyright infringement.”

Well, their $7.3 million loss says otherwise.

And it became the record high judgment in a copyright infringement suit. So that’s saying something.

A real, authorized Marvin Gaye documentary is finally coming

“Blurred Lines” didn’t go down without a fight though. Back when it was released, even Questlove tried to weigh in with his support for his fellow contemporaries, telling Vulture:

“I’m siding with Robin Thicke; I’m going against the estate of Marvin Gaye. Look, technically it’s not plagiarized. It’s not the same chord progression. It’s a feeling. Because there’s a cowbell in it and a fender Rhodes as the main instrumentation — that still doesn’t make it plagiarized. We all know it’s derivative. That’s how Pharrell works. Everything that Pharrell produces is derivative of another song — but it’s an homage. If it were a case of melodic plagiarism, I would definitely side with the estate. But in this case…I’m still siding with Pharrell and Robin on this one.”

Note Quest’s use of the word “feeling.”

And note this writer’s use of it, as well. Here’s how SPIN‘s Andrew Unterberger—who noticed the similarities over a year ago, before anyone else (and maybe even Townsend) did—wrote about the two current songs in question:

“[‘Thinking Out Loud’] is also an incredibly obvious successor to Marvin Gaye’s 1973 superlative slow jam ‘Let’s Get It On’ — the gently loping four-note bass pattern and crisp ’70s soul drums absolutely smack of the Gaye classic, as do the embrace-insistent lyrics and general candlelit-bedroom feel.”

There it is again.

The point is, Williams and Thicke had to pay up. And if this new precedent set is all about vibesss, there’s a good chance Sheeran will too.

Full Article – https://revolt.tv/stories/2016/08/10/ed-sheeran-worried-allegedly-copying-marvin-gaye-song-8a3ce18fb7