Feds confirm civil rights investigation into Waukegan District 60

Officials with the U.S. Department of Education have confirmed that its Office for Civil Rights is investigating complaints against Waukegan Public School District 60, including allegations of racial discrimination in both discipline matters and sexual harassment protections.

Local activist Chris “Brotha” Blanks, who founded the Black Abolition Movement for the Mind in Waukegan, reported earlier this month that he filed a set of complaints against the district in October and was informed in December that an investigation would take place.

While an official with the department’s Chicago office said he was not authorized to comment following Blanks’ announcement, a Department of Education spokesman said in a Feb. 17 statement that an investigation was opened on Dec. 14 and no timeline or estimated date of completion could be reported. The spokesman added that “because this is an open investigation, (the Office for Civil Rights) cannot provide further details or case-specific information.”

In general, the statement added, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) investigates issues of racial discrimination in the administration of discipline and also in differential treatment, denial of benefits, exclusion or retaliation as covered under Title VI, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance. Also investigated are alleged sexual violence issues related to Title IX, the federal law that guarantees female students protection from discrimination and sexual harassment.

Information on the complaints released by Blanks accuse the district of subjecting African-American and Hispanic students to exclusionary discipline “more frequently and for less serious offenses than white students.” A separate complaint claims the district fails to “promptly and equitably respond to complaints, reports and/or incidents of sexual harassment, including sexual violence.”

Regarding how such investigations proceed and what penalties might be involved, the Department of Education statement said policy dictates that an investigator serves as “a neutral fact-finder” in gathering information through data requests, interviews and site visits.

“It should be noted that the opening of an investigation by OCR in itself does not indicate that the institution is violating or has violated any federal law or that OCR has reached a conclusion as to whether a violation of any federal law exists,” the statement added. “As part of its investigation process, OCR gathers information through a variety of methods to determine if a school or district is meeting its obligations to comply with the civil rights laws that OCR enforces.

“OCR analyzes all relevant evidence from the parties involved in the case to develop its findings. At the conclusion of the investigation of all issues, OCR will determine if the evidence supports a conclusion of noncompliance or if the evidence is insufficient.”

Districts found to have broken a law and refused to address the problems can lose federal funding or be referred to the U.S. Department of Justice for unspecified further action, according to the statement.

“Where the office finds that a violation has occurred, OCR works with the institution to reach a resolution agreement,” the statement added. “All resolutions are case-specific and fact-dependent. Through these agreements with schools, OCR has been able to attain strong remedies without the need to initiate enforcement actions, either through the initiation of an administrative hearing to terminate federal funding or a referral to the Department of Justice for judicial relief.

“However, initiating proceedings to revoke federal funds is a tool that OCR will utilize, if necessary, to achieve compliance.”

District 60 officials acknowledged in a statement released earlier this month that they had begun cooperating with the investigation.

“We are currently working to fulfill the Office of Civil Rights’ request for numerous documents and records, which will be used in the OCR’s investigation,” the Feb. 10 statement read. “As we work to comply with these requests we, unfortunately, cannot comment further.”

danmoran@tribpub.com

Twitter @NewsSunDanMoran

Copyright © 2016, Lake County News-Sun

Apple’s clash with the FBI will be a tough legal fight

BY SERGIO HERNANDEZ & CHRISTINA WARREN

Apple may face an uphill climb in its latest fight with the feds over digital privacy.

The company’s CEO, Tim Cook, said in a statement on its website Wednesday that Apple opposes a federal court’s order to write special software so federal investigators can penetrate the passcode for an iPhone once used by Syed Farook.

Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, were the perpetrators of a shooting spree in San Bernardino, Calif., on Dec. 2, which killed 14 people and injured 22 others. The shooters were later killed during a gunfight with police.

Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation and lawyers from the Justice Department have said Farook’s phone, and iPhone 5C, may contain key evidence about his communications in the weeks before the attack, but they cannot access it without Farook’s passcode.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym issued the Apple order on Tuesday, after the local U.S. Attorney petitioned a federal court for Apple’s help.

FBI agents have been unable to access the phone’s contents because of security features built into the device’s software. Those include one that forces users to wait several minutes before entering different passcodes. Another erases a decryption key necessary to access the device’s data if a user enters a wrong passcode too frequently.

The judge’s order instructs Apple to write custom software, called a “Software Image File,” to bypass these security features so the FBI can quickly test an unlimited number of passcodes until it finds the right one. Once that as-yet-uncreated software is installed on the phone, security experts say it would take no more than a day to find the code.

News of the order triggered fierce debate last week as technologists wondered whether Apple can, as a matter of technical ability, comply with the demand, while privacy advocates said engineering such software could have dangerous security implications. Legal experts said it raises constitutional questions about how far the government can go when conscripting private, third parties to assist with law enforcement.

Cook’s statement, which indicated the company planned to fight the order in court, prompted the Justice Department to file a new motion on Friday, asking Pym to compel Apple to comply with her previous order.

Read Full Article – http://mashable.com/2016/02/21/apple-fbi-legal-issues/#Im3rLfAR_iq9

Kesha sobs as judge refuses to cancel contract with producer Dr. Luke who allegedly raped her in 2006

BY BARBARA ROSS NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Updated: Saturday, February 20, 2016, 12:14 AM

“Tik Tok” star Kesha broke into tears Friday when a Manhattan Supreme Court judge refused to let her walk away from a six-album deal with Sony — and the man she claims raped her.

The singer had sought to nullify her recording contract because it brought her into contact with super-producer Dr. Luke, whose real name is Luke Gottwald.

KESHA’S ALLEGED RAPE HAPPENED WHEN SHE WAS 18-YEAR-OLD VIRGIN

The 28-year-old, whose real name is Kesha Rose Sebert, claims that Dr. Luke (inset) drugged her with a pill that made her black out and raped her shortly after her 18th birthday in California. He was never criminally charged.

Sony has offered to let her work with another producer, but Kesha said she fears the company won’t promote her music as heavily if she’s not working with Gottwald, their biggest hitmaker.

NJ town providing legal tips to illegal immigrants to skirt ICE raids

By

A New Jersey town is attempting to protect illegal immigrants from “really unfortunate” arrests by publishing handouts in English and Spanish that encourage immigrants “to remain silent” and “have a plan!” if confronted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers.

The response from Princeton officials comes following the targeted arrest of two illegal immigrants in the town early Thursday morning, one of whom had a drunken driving conviction, an ICE official told NJ.com.

Councilwoman Heather Howard has been a leading advocate for working with the local immigrant population to prevent detentions and deportations.

protect your illegal family
raid ice

“These [arrests] are really unfortunate,” she told NJ.com. “They cause fear and panic in the community, and they work to undermine the community’s effort to improve law enforcement relations.”

An ICE spokesperson told FoxNews.com the town’s efforts wouldn’t impede ICE’s duties.

“It’s not gonna hinder our operations,” Alvin Phillips said. “Standard operations are still ongoing and based on priorities.”

He added: “ICE arrests are not unfortunate. In fact to the contrary of previous reports — ICE actions are in keeping with the laws and homeland security priorities: National Security, Public Safety and Border Security. I will also add, arrests in question are afforded an opportunity to meet with legal counsel.”

Several “Know Your Rights” handouts on the town government’s website advise immigrants “if you or someone you love is deportable, have a plan!” Another section of one of the pamphlets tells immigrants to not “answer questions about your immigration status or where you were born. Keep saying you want to call your attorney.”

The publications come complete with cartoons of smiling immigrants flashing cards that say “I want to speak with my lawyer” and shocked immigrants being busted by angry ICE agents, often appearing menacing and wearing dark sunglasses.

The pamphlets even encourage readers not to provide their names to officers: “Remember that providing your name has risks, and that your name can be used to start a deportation process.”

A “Right To Remain Silent Card” is printed near the end of one of the publications with cut-out lines drawn around it for those who wish to detach and carry it.

lawerice

The card states: “TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please be informed that I am choosing to exercise my right to remain silent and the right to refuse to answer your questions. If I am detained, I request to contact an attorney immediately. I am also exercising my right to refuse to sign anything until I consult with my attorney.”

Elisa Neira, the executive director of Human Services, said the goal of the literature is to better inform illegal immigrants of their rights.

Read Full Article – http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/02/17/nj-town-providing-legal-tips-to-illegal-immigrants-to-skirt-ice-raids.html